[ixpmanager] Trouble adding v6 /64

[Kyle Spencer]

Nick et al,

Thanks for the feedback. This has been a very helpful discussion.

Thinking at scale here: If the number of peers exceeds /24 and the IXP
gets allocated more address space, how would you keep your v6
numbering scheme in-sync?

Extending your example:

186.6.36.6 = 2001:7f8:18::6

But then you are allocated another /24:

186.6.37.6 = ?

Regards,
Kyle Spencer

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Barry O'Donovan <barry.odonovan at inex.ie> wrote:
>
>
> Martin J. Levy wrote:
>>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5963
>>     IPv6 Deployment in Internet Exchange Points (IXPs)
>
> Really not sure why sections 3 (1) and (2) are there at all. Why are
> people so intent on 'encoding' data in a v6 address :-/
>
>
>  - Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> INEX IXP Manager mailing list
> ixpmanager at inex.ie
> https://www.inex.ie/mailman/listinfo/ixpmanager



-- 
Cell/WhatsApp/Signal: +256790884905