[ixpmanager] arouteserver vs IXP Manager

Richard Laager rlaager at wiktel.com
Mon May 1 15:42:42 IST 2023


We (MICE) don’t have a route collector.

I have read a little about route collectors. Am I correct in understanding that they are the same as a route server, except they are input only? And everyone peers with them? Do you get any push back on that requirement from bilateral only networks?

-- 
Richard

> On May 1, 2023, at 04:38, Nishal Goburdhan via ixpmanager <ixpmanager at inex.ie> wrote:
> 
> On 27 Apr 2023, at 9:15, André Grüneberg via ixpmanager wrote:
> 
> [anip]
> 
> aside from all the good advice here already seen here ..
> 
>> Regarding Looking Glass, you may as well have a look into Alice LG. I
>> agree, the IXP Manager internal implementation is practical, but I am a bit
>> opinionated towards Alice LG.
> 
> we use alice-lg, _intentionally_ to create a mental shift between ixpmanager’s built-in looking glass (ie: “view from the filtered route-servers”) vs. alice-lg’s (“view from the unfiltered route collector”).
> 
> * unfiltered” vs. “filtered
> * not everyone peers with the route-servers
> * unified interface to query N* IXPs locations
> .. are good enough to have both services.
> 
> configuration is generated from ixpmanager, because that’s easiest.
> 
> -n.
> _______________________________________________
> INEX IXP Manager mailing list
> ixpmanager at inex.ie
> Unsubscribe or change options here: https://www.inex.ie/mailman/listinfo/ixpmanager


More information about the ixpmanager mailing list