<html>
<head></head>
<body> <span dir="ltr" style="font-family:sans-serif">Makes perfect sense to me as well.</span>
<br>
<br>
<br> <span dir="ltr" style="font-family:sans-serif">Cheers</span>
<br> <span dir="ltr" style="font-family:sans-serif">Arnold</span>
<br>
<div>
<br>
<p>30.07.2021 02:07:25 Pim van Pelt <pim@ipng.nl>:</p>
<blockquote style="border-left:3px solid #ccc; padding-left:3px">
<div dir="ltr" style="">
<div dir="ltr" style="">
Hoi Arnold!
<div style="">
<br style="">
</div>
<div style="">
Thanks for helping this along.
</div>
</div>
<br style="">
<div class="gmail_quote" style="">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr" style="">
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 1:57 AM Arnold Nipper <<a href="mailto:arnold@nipper.de" style="">arnold@nipper.de</a>> wrote:
<br style="">
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br style=""> may I suggest to make the export configurable. E.g. like
<br style="">
<br style=""> Status Export Export Name
<br style=""> Connected yes active
<br style=""> Awaiting X-Connect no
<br style=""> Quarantine yes inactive
<br style="">
</blockquote>
<div style="">
<br style="">
</div>
<div style="">
From my experience, this may still trigger IX-F import alerts. From my sampleset of 4 (a few small IXPs, and SwissIX), the IXP will make an IP assignment and inform the member "hey welcome to IXP $x, your port is $P and your addresses are <$a>". Enthusiastic members then go update their peeringdb entry by themselves.
</div>
<div style="">
<br style="">
</div>
<div style="">
So as soon as the list of $a is given to the member, we risk the state of IXPManager not exporting IX-F, but the member having updated their entry.
</div>
<div style="">
This means, in practice, that as soon as the member exists in the IXPManager database, the IX-F export should reflect an export of 'inactive' or 'active', not not 'no-export', because that will trigger the peeringdb importer escalation.However, if the member doesn't exist at all at IXPManager, but they did claim an IP in peeringdb, that does sound like a legitimate escalation to me.
</div>
<div style="">
<br style="">
</div>
<div style="">
So I would rewrite your truth table as:
</div>
<div style="">
Connected, yes, active
</div>
<div style="">
*, yes, inactive
</div>
<div style="">
<br style="">
</div>
<div style="">
groet,
</div>
<div style="">
Pim
</div>
<div style="">
<br style="">
</div>
<div style="">
groet,
</div>
<div style="">
Pim
</div>
<div style="">
</div>
</div>--
<br style="">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" style="">
Pim van Pelt <<a href="mailto:pim@ipng.nl" target="_blank" style="">pim@ipng.nl</a>>
<br style="">PBVP1-RIPE - <a href="http://www.ipng.nl/" target="_blank" style="">http://www.ipng.nl/</a>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>